Capabilities - Revision history

Livesadmin at 10:17, 14 October 2025

2025-10-14T10:17:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:17, 14 October 2025
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0		\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
	\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet		\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
			\| options= {{NetworkOptions}}
	}}		}}

Livesadmin at 14:12, 20 April 2021

2021-04-20T14:12:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:12, 20 April 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.		Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of [[Resources\|resources]] and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of [[Resources\|resources]] and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material [[Resources\|resources]] or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.
	<br>		<br>
	<br>		<br>

Livesadmin: /* Semantic network visualisation */

2021-03-09T14:45:35Z

Semantic network visualisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 9 March 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==Semantic network visualisation==		==Semantic network visualisation==
	Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality		Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality
			''(scroll to zoom, drag nodes to move, click and hold nodes to open next level)''
	{{#network:		{{#network:
	\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0		\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
	\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet		\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
	}}		}}

Livesadmin at 14:28, 9 March 2021

2021-03-09T14:28:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 9 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Sen, A. (1999). ''Development as Freedom''. New York: Knopf.<br>		Sen, A. (1999). ''Development as Freedom''. New York: Knopf.<br>

	==~~semantic~~ network visualisation==		==Semantic network visualisation==
	Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality		Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality
	{{#network:		{{#network:

Livesadmin: /* semantic network visualisation */

2021-03-09T14:10:57Z

semantic network visualisation

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 9 March 2021
Line 10:		Line 10:

	==semantic network visualisation==		==semantic network visualisation==
			Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality
	{{#network:		{{#network:
	\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0		\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
	\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet		\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
	}}		}}

Livesadmin at 13:59, 9 March 2021

2021-03-09T13:59:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 9 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.		Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.
			<br>
			<br>
			Author: Jean-Michel Bonvin

	==References==		==References==

Livesadmin at 10:37, 5 March 2021

2021-03-05T10:37:27Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value.  On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.
@@ Line 9: / Line 5: @@
 Bonvin, J.-M., Farvaque, N. & Sen, A. (2008). Amartya Sen, ''Une politique de la liberté''. Paris, Michalon. <br>
 Sen, A. (1999). ''Development as Freedom''. New York: Knopf.<br>

Livesadmin at 13:21, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T13:21:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{#network:		{{#network:
	\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0		\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
	\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap		\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
	}}		}}
	Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.		Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.

Livesadmin at 13:19, 4 March 2021

2021-03-04T13:19:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 4 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{#network:
			\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
			\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap
			}}
	Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.		Capability is a concept designed by Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen. It is defined as the “real freedom to lead the kind of life people have reason to value” (Sen, 1999). It relies on two pillars (Bonvin and Farvaque, 2006, 2008). On the one hand, people should be entitled to real freedom and not only to formal freedom, which entails taking into account the distribution of resources and rights, as well as the individual capacities to use them and the appropriateness of the environment. In this first respect, the empowerment of people relies on the availability of a whole configuration of resources and rights, and of individual and social ‘conversion factors’. Being empowered is not only a matter of owning material resources or of having individual skills or competencies, it is also a matter of living in an adequate socioeconomic environment that allows leading a life one has reason to value. On the other hand, freedom to choose is considered intrinsically valuable so that people should be allowed to live a life they have reason to value, and not be dictated by others how they should behave or live. This approach implies that their aspirations and wishes are to be taken seriously. However, this does not mean that people should be allowed to pursue whatever life they want, but one that they have reason to value. The emphasis on ‘reasonability’ is crucial: not all individual aspirations can be considered as ‘automatically’ reasonable; some are too high (the so-called expensive tastes), others are too low (the so-called adaptive preferences whereby people living in poor conditions adjust their expectations to what seems realistic to them). In the capability perspective, individual preferences are to be submitted to a public debate and only if they survive this test, they are considered as reasonable and entitled to public support. This also entails that public action should aim at developing people’s capacity to aspire or to imagine different futures rather than simply providing them with the means to adapt to their present circumstances.

Imstepft at 12:49, 8 October 2020

2020-10-08T12:49:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 8 October 2020
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==References==		==References==
	Bonvin, J.-M~~. and Farvaque, N~~. (2006). Promoting ~~Capability~~ for ~~Work~~: ~~The Role~~ of ~~Local Actors~~. In ~~Deneulin, S., Nebel, M., & Sagovsky, N. (eds.) <br>~~		Bonvin, J. M. (2006). Promoting capability for work: the role of local actors. In ''Transforming unjust structures the capability approach'' (pp. 121-142). Springer, Dordrecht. <br>
	''Transforming ~~Unjust Structures. The Capability Approach~~'', (pp. ~~121–142~~). Dordrecht~~: Springer Netherlands~~.<br>		Bonvin, J.-M., Farvaque, N. & Sen, A. (2008). Amartya Sen, ''Une politique de la liberté''. Paris, Michalon. <br>
	Bonvin, J.-M., Farvaque, N. (2008), Amartya Sen, ''Une politique de la liberté'', Paris, Michalon. <br>		Sen, A. (1999). ''Development as Freedom''. New York: Knopf.<br>
	Sen, A. (1999), ''Development as Freedom'', New York: Knopf<br>