Recovery - Revision history

Livesadmin at 08:48, 10 December 2025

2025-12-10T08:48:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 10 December 2025
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0		\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
	\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet		\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
			\| options= {{NetworkOptions}}
	}}		}}

Livesadmin at 13:27, 21 September 2022

2022-09-21T13:27:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:27, 21 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective or personal recovery is an individual perception meaning that the concerned person manages to lead a satisfying and purposeful life, develops self-esteem and a positive identity in the face of an illness (Anthony, 1993; Davidson & Roe, 2007; Deegan, 1988; Onken, Craig, Ridgway, Ralph, & Cook, 2007). While objective recovery is measured with the corresponding symptom scales, there are specific quantitative and qualitative instruments to assess subjective recovery. One frequently used instrument in the context of illness is the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS; Corrigan, Salzer, Ralph, Sangster, & Keck, 2004) including five dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others and no domination by symptoms. A more process-oriented instrument assessing different stages of subjective recovery in the context of mental illness is the Stages Of Recovery Instrument (Andresen, Caputi, Oades, 2006). Recovery can be achieved through an individual or a group process. On a collective level, social identity or [[Social capital\|social capital]] based programs aim at achieving recovery through processes fostering group resources. These can operate either at a small-group, community regional levels or on larger groups or categories such as equity deserving groups.<br>		Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective or personal recovery is an individual perception meaning that the concerned person manages to lead a satisfying and purposeful life, develops self-esteem and a positive identity in the face of an illness (Anthony, 1993; Davidson & Roe, 2007; Deegan, 1988; Onken, Craig, Ridgway, Ralph, & Cook, 2007). While objective recovery is measured with the corresponding symptom scales, there are specific quantitative and qualitative instruments to assess subjective recovery. One frequently used instrument in the context of illness is the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS; Corrigan, Salzer, Ralph, Sangster, & Keck, 2004) including five dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others and no domination by symptoms. A more process-oriented instrument assessing different stages of subjective recovery in the context of mental illness is the Stages Of Recovery Instrument (Andresen, Caputi, Oades, 2006). Recovery can be achieved through an individual or a group process. On a collective level, social identity or [[Social capital\|social capital]] based programs aim at achieving recovery through processes fostering group [[Resources\|resources]]. These can operate either at a small-group, community regional levels or on larger groups or categories such as equity deserving groups.<br>
	<br>		<br>
	Author: Klaas, Hannah S.<br>		Author: Klaas, Hannah S.<br>

Livesadmin at 13:24, 21 September 2022

2022-09-21T13:24:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 21 September 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective or personal recovery is an individual perception meaning that the concerned person manages to lead a satisfying and purposeful life, develops self-esteem and a positive identity in the face of an illness (Anthony, 1993; Davidson & Roe, 2007; Deegan, 1988; Onken, Craig, Ridgway, Ralph, & Cook, 2007). While objective recovery is measured with the corresponding symptom scales, there are specific quantitative and qualitative instruments to assess subjective recovery. One frequently used instrument in the context of illness is the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS; Corrigan, Salzer, Ralph, Sangster, & Keck, 2004) including five dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others and no domination by symptoms. A more process-oriented instrument assessing different stages of subjective recovery in the context of mental illness is the Stages Of Recovery Instrument (Andresen, Caputi, Oades, 2006). Recovery can be achieved through an individual or a group process. On a collective level, social identity or social capital based programs aim at achieving recovery through processes fostering group resources. These can operate either at a small-group, community regional levels or on larger groups or categories such as equity deserving groups.<br>		Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective or personal recovery is an individual perception meaning that the concerned person manages to lead a satisfying and purposeful life, develops self-esteem and a positive identity in the face of an illness (Anthony, 1993; Davidson & Roe, 2007; Deegan, 1988; Onken, Craig, Ridgway, Ralph, & Cook, 2007). While objective recovery is measured with the corresponding symptom scales, there are specific quantitative and qualitative instruments to assess subjective recovery. One frequently used instrument in the context of illness is the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS; Corrigan, Salzer, Ralph, Sangster, & Keck, 2004) including five dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others and no domination by symptoms. A more process-oriented instrument assessing different stages of subjective recovery in the context of mental illness is the Stages Of Recovery Instrument (Andresen, Caputi, Oades, 2006). Recovery can be achieved through an individual or a group process. On a collective level, social identity or [[Social capital\|social capital]] based programs aim at achieving recovery through processes fostering group resources. These can operate either at a small-group, community regional levels or on larger groups or categories such as equity deserving groups.<br>
	<br>		<br>
	Author: Klaas, Hannah S.<br>		Author: Klaas, Hannah S.<br>

Livesadmin at 13:23, 21 September 2022

2022-09-21T13:23:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:23, 21 September 2022
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11–19.<br>		Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11–19.<br>
	Onken, S. J., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R. O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 9–22. <br>		Onken, S. J., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R. O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 9–22. <br>

			==Semantic network visualisation==
			Click to activate zoom- and drag-fonctionnality
			''(scroll to zoom, drag nodes to move, click and hold nodes to open next level)''
			{{#network:
			\| class = col-lg-3 mt-0
			\| exclude = Main Page ; Sitemap ; Worksheet
			}}

Livesadmin: Created page with "Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective..."

2022-09-21T13:22:46Z

Created page with "Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective..."

New page

Recovery from a mental or physical illness, or a traumatic life or collective experience can refer to a process or a state (the result of the recovery process). It can be conceptualised on several levels (individuals, groups, regions) and as an individual or group process. On an individual level, clinical practice and research distinguish objective and subjective recovery. Objective recovery refers to a medically defined process or state of symptom remission. Subjective or personal recovery is an individual perception meaning that the concerned person manages to lead a satisfying and purposeful life, develops self-esteem and a positive identity in the face of an illness (Anthony, 1993; Davidson & Roe, 2007; Deegan, 1988; Onken, Craig, Ridgway, Ralph, & Cook, 2007). While objective recovery is measured with the corresponding symptom scales, there are specific quantitative and qualitative instruments to assess subjective recovery. One frequently used instrument in the context of illness is the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS; Corrigan, Salzer, Ralph, Sangster, & Keck, 2004) including five dimensions: personal confidence and hope, willingness to ask for help, goal and success orientation, reliance on others and no domination by symptoms. A more process-oriented instrument assessing different stages of subjective recovery in the context of mental illness is the Stages Of Recovery Instrument (Andresen, Caputi, Oades, 2006). Recovery can be achieved through an individual or a group process. On a collective level, social identity or social capital based programs aim at achieving recovery through processes fostering group resources. These can operate either at a small-group, community regional levels or on larger groups or categories such as equity deserving groups. 
 
Author: Klaas, Hannah S. 
Co-author: Ehsan, Anna 

 
==References==
Andresen, R., Caputi, P., & Oades, L. (2006). Stages of Recovery Instrument: Development of a Measure of Recovery from Serious Mental Illness. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40(11-12), 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01921.x 
Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0095655 
Corrigan, P. W., Salzer, M., Ralph, R. O., Sangster, Y., & Keck, L. (2004). Examining the Factor Structure of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 1035–1041. 
Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11–19. 
Onken, S. J., Craig, C. M., Ridgway, P., Ralph, R. O., & Cook, J. A. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: a review of the literature. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31(1), 9–22.